Category Archives: iLanguage

Autocorrect vs. iLanguage

An obvious place where natural language must get filtered through technology is texting.  However, with the advent of autocorrect, texting has become a rather perilous endeavor with humorous results.

What makes damnyouautocorrect.com so funny??

1.  Although “sex-ting” has made headlines, I am pretty sure that the primary purpose of texting for most people is not to send dirty words, and especially not to one’s parents.  This is something Apple appears not to have taken into account when creating their autocorrect algorithm. (Or did they?)  For most people, dirty words are less frequent than other types of words, particularly for the domain of texting.

2.  On the other hand, one thing the autocorrect algorithm does appear to take into account is part of speech.  If autocorrect algorithm just returned the closest word, it might not be the same part of speech than the word intended, resulting in just gibberish.  But the mistaken texts are funny because they do make sense, and do have semantic meaning, just not the intended meaning.

If autocorrect had provided a verb “broil” or an adjective “broiled” instead of an noun the result would have just merely been weird rather than funny.

It is precisely this mixture of getting some things right and some things wrong that permits these texts to occur.  While autocorrect does take the immediate linguistic context into account, it does not consider the context of the text itself, which is not something easily determined by an algorithm.

What do you think? Do you see any patterns in the autocorrect mistakes? Do you have any observations about texting that you think might improve the algorithm?

Fork me on GitHub

What is iLanguage?

Welcome to the iLanguageLab Blog! The iLanguage Lab seeks to put Natural Language Processing and Field Linguistics into the pockets of consumers by building productivity tools and OpenSource NLP plugins which adapt to the user’s iLanguage.

Ahhhh, but, you ask, what is iLanguage? Well, the term is accredited to famous linguist Noam Chomsky in 1986 who proposed that we distinguish between I-language and E-language.  No…. it is not the difference between an iPad and an eBook!! To put it simply, iLanguage is your internal, individual language.  The representation of language in your head.  E-language on the other hand is external language,  the language that out there in the world… in the wild!

This distinction becomes very important when you add technology into the equation.  Technology handles e-language all the time.  However, technology often fails to adapt to I-Language.  It doesn’t really know what that word means to YOU.  To a computer, Voldemort is just another word.  However, to many of the wizards and witches at Hogwarts Voldemort is “He-who-must-not-be-named” or “You-know-who”.  While “you-know-who” may be your nosy aunt’s way of asking about your current significant other– “Hows it going with you know who?”

Here at iLanguageLab we try to bridge this gap.  Through this blog, we will keep you up to date with the company’s activities as well as provoke discussions about when technology gets iLanguage wrong (damn you autocorrect anyone?).  We hope that you will read along and enjoy our our little corner where fieldlinguistics and technology meet.